<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Code Quality on Dominique Biesmans</title>
    <link>https://dominique.biesmans.com/tags/code-quality/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Code Quality on Dominique Biesmans</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://dominique.biesmans.com/tags/code-quality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Who&#39;s Reading The Code? Code Quality in the AI-First World.</title>
      <link>https://dominique.biesmans.com/posts/quality-metrics-shift/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://dominique.biesmans.com/posts/quality-metrics-shift/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-analogy-compilers&#34;&gt;The Analogy: Compilers&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I am almost (haha) old enough to have been exposed to handwritten assembly language, and when I played with compiler tech, I could see a big difference in the assembly code a compiler wrote versus hand-written and manually optimized assembly.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The handwritten version was structured for human comprehension. Meaningful labels, comments explaining intent, code organized in a flow that tells a story, (re)using patterns that assembly developers know and recognize. A thing of beauty (really, handwritten assembly can be an art, especially in the world of very limited CPUs where each cycle matters, but I am deviating).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
